Thursday, July 4, 2019

Adoptive Parents Hide Secret Letter From Chinese Daughter’s Birth Family

OMG! |

Kati Pohler

Kati Pohler had a normal and happy childhood growing up in a close-knit community in the quiet town of Hudsonville, Michigan. She was always aware that she was adopted, but she never asked many questions while growing up. Kati had no idea about her birth parents back in China, and wasn’t aware of how much they had sacrificed to ensure her survival under the strict one-child policy in China. What’s more, she didn’t even know they left a letter with a special request for whomever found her. Her adopted parents kept the letter a secret, until everything flooded out into the open.

1. A Loving Couple

Xu Lida and Qian Fenxiang married in their early 20s after meeting in their home of Baoying County, near Yangzhou in the province of Jiangsu, China. Soon after they tied the knot, the couple moved to the outskirts of Hangzhou.
Xu Lida and Qian Fenxiang
inspiremore.com
They were working in the scrap trade in the prosperous city of Hangzhou, which proved to be quite profitable in the early ’90s. The housing facilities where they lived, however, were so remote that when Qian went into labor with their first daughter, Xiaochen, Xu had no other choice but to put his wife at the back of a delivery tricycle and pedal as fast as he could for miles to the hospital.

2. Expanding the Family

Despite all their hardships, Xu and Qian tried to make the best of every situation. They felt optimistic that they could give their daughter a happy and secure life, and therefore they made the decision to give her a sibling.
Hangzhou
twitter.com
There was only one problem: China’s one-child policy. Nevertheless, the couple thought they wouldn’t be caught in such a big city. “We thought we could get away with it since we lived so far away from the family planning cadres in our village,” Xu recalled. Unfortunately, they would soon learn just how brutal the regime could be.

3. The Long Arm of the Law

China’s one-child policy came into effect in 1979 as part of the family planning policy to reduce poverty and manage the size of the population. Harsh measures such as sterilization and steep fines were implemented to anyone who exceeded their quota of one child per family, until the policy came to an end in 2015.
China's Once-Child Policy
cnn.com
In 1995, Qian found out she was pregnant again. “I would have felt so sorry if we had aborted her. I thought that even if we couldn’t afford to raise her, we could give her away,” Xu recalled to the South China Morning Post. Qian and Xu had a plan, though.

4. The Dangerous Birth

Qian was only 24-years-old and terrified of the authorities and any spies, so she decided to hide for the last six weeks of her pregnancy on a secluded houseboat, about 75 miles (120 km) from Hangzhou on the Suzhou canal.
Houseboat on Suzhou Canal
lifedaily.com
When Qian’s water broke they couldn’t go to the hospital for fear of getting her newborn killed, so Xu sterilized scissors with boiling water and cut the umbilical cord. However, the couple had to seek the help of a physician after some complications with the placenta arose, but he promised not to tell the authorities. This was just the beginning of the end though.

5. A Heartbreaking Farewell

Qian and Xu were well aware that their newborn daughter, whom they named Jingzhi, was in grave danger. They decided that the best thing was to give her away, as heartbreaking as it was. The plan was to take her to the nearby vegetable market and leave her under a covered spot where someone would find her.

chinadaily.com.cn
“On the morning of the third day she was born, I prepared her milk, I held her and hugged her for a while. Then I walked to the market. She didn’t cry. She was asleep. I kissed her gently. I knew it was the final goodbye,” Xu lamented to the South China Morning Post. Little did they know, this wouldn’t be the final farewell.

6. The Handwritten Letter

Qian and Xu weren’t about to give up Jingzhi without some kind of  valid explanation as to why they had to give up their beautiful daughter. So they left a handwritten letter with their little girl, along with a special request.
The Handwritten Letter
lifedaily.com
The letter read: “Our daughter, Jingzhi, was born at 10 a.m. on the 24th day of the seventh month of the lunar calendar, 1995. We have been forced by poverty and affairs of the world to abandon her. Oh, pity the hearts of fathers and mothers far and near! Thank you for saving our little daughter and taking her into your care. If the heavens have feelings, if we are brought together by fate, then let us meet again on the Broken Bridge in Hangzhou on the morning of the Qixi Festival in 10 or 20 years from now.”

7. The Hand of Fate

Soon after Jingzhi was found abandoned at the vegetable market, an orphanage in Suzhou took her into their care. She started growing up and in 1996, just a year after she was born, something happened that would change the course of her life.
Suzhou Orphanage
lifedaily.com
One of the biggest international adoption agencies for Americans called Bethany Christian Services arranged for 10 American couples to come to the orphanage in China to adopt daughters. The orphanage was filled with girls because of one-child policy and the Chinese preference for boys.

8. The Pohlers

Ken and Ruth Pohler from Hudsonville, Michigan were one of the couples who came with the organization to the orphanage. “We didn’t really think it mattered which country we adopted from, but we have a brother-in-law who is Chinese and Ruth’s sister was adopted from China too, which was neat,” Ken told BBC.
Ruth Pohler Holding Jingzhi for the First Time
youtube.com
The couple were keen to adopt a little Chinese girl and Ruth was beaming with excitement when she laid her eyes on Jingzhi. Once everything was in order, the staff gave the Pohlers the letter from Jingzhi’s birth parents, the letter that would change everything.

9. The Secret Letter

Once the Pohlers boarded the bus, Ken and Ruth turned to their translator to ask what this letter was all about. When the translator read it out to them in English, she burst into tears because of Qian and Xu’s heartfelt message.
The Letter from Qian and Xu
womenintheworld.com
The Pohlers were also moved but quite taken aback. After some deliberation, they felt this letter would only complicate their daughter’s life so they agreed to keep the letter a secret until she was at least 18. They believed that by that age she’d be emotionally mature enough to handle such news. What’s more, they decided to show her only if Jingzhi wanted to know about her past.

10. Your All American Girl

When Jingzhi arrived in Hudsonville, Michigan, the Pohlers renamed her Catherine Su and called her Kati for short. Her adopted parents gave her a happy and normal life in small-town America, where Kati enjoyed a typical American lifestyle and childhood.
Kati Pohler
cbsnews.com
The Pohlers were also deeply religious, so Kati attended church every week with her close-knit community. Everyone knew Kati was adopted, so know one felt the need to talk about it or bring it up. “My two brothers are quite a bit older. I guess if I felt different, it was because I was the youngest and I was a girl,” Kati told BBC.

11. Beautiful Memories

Kati blossomed into a beautiful girl who excelled at everything she did. The family albums boast lots of photographs of young Kati traveling the country with her parents and on school trips, playing the piano and viola, and winning sports tournaments. She led an active and outdoor kind of life, which kept her healthy and smiling.
Kati Pohler and Her Adopted Mother and Brother
scmp.com
There were times Kati was curious about her past, but she didn’t really bring it up. Sometimes she’d ask Ruth: “Did I come from your tummy?” and her mother would respond, “No you didn’t come from my tummy. You came for a lady’s tummy in China, but you came from my heart. You were born of my heart.” Then Kati would run off and get preoccupied with something else, a sign for Ruth that Kati was content with that answer.

12. Meanwhile, Back in China

As time went by, Qian and Xu opened a second-hand electric appliance store. The couple worked seven days a week, to support their eldest daughter and themselves. They also saved up enough money to buy a two bedroom apartment after living in poverty for years.
Qian Working in Second-Hand Technical Appliance Store in China
scmp.com
It might have seemed like they got on with their lives, but they never forgot about their beautiful Jingzhi, nor their promise to come find her when she turned 10 years old. The note specified to meet at the Broken Bridge on the day of the Qixi Festival, which is like the Chinese Valentine’s Day. The problem was, they weren’t sure if their daughter would be there.

13. The 10-Year Mark

Qian and Xu prayed that Jingzhi’s adoptive parents would read their letter, and that they’d fulfill their wish to see her again. The day came and the family went to the bridge, ready to be reunited with their beloved daughter.
The Broken Bridge
scmp.com
“We got there early, and we carried a big sign with our daughter’s name and words similar to those we used in the original note,” Xu told BBC. He recalled how awful they felt by wanting to run over to every single girl they saw on the bridge. All they could do was wait with hope; a hope that lay in the hands of the Pohlers.

14. A Failed Attempt

Qian and Xu waited the whole day, but by the time it was 4 p.m., they had a feeling they weren’t going to see their daughter. Soon after, the couple decided to go home with their heads hanging down in disappointment.
Qian and Xu - Kati's Birth Parents
youtube.com
But Kati’s birth parents had no idea that the letter was indeed received and her new parents hadn’t forgotten about their request. In fact, the Pohlers prayed about it and talked with a friend of theirs who often traveled to China for business. The only issue was that the Pohlers’ plan happened just a moment too late.

15. Reaching Out

The Pohler’s friend got in touch with a friend of his called Annie Wu, who went to the bridge to find Qian and Xu. They didn’t want to involve Kati at this point, but they wanted her birth parents to rest assured that she was adopted by a family who adored her very much and had provided her with a good home.
The Broken Bridge
lifedaily.com
Unfortunately, Qian and Xu left only a few moments before Annie Wu got to the bridge. She double checked the bridge for any distressed-looking parents, but there was nothing. However, just when Wu was about to leave, something caught her attention.

16. Caught on Camera

Wu was about to depart the bridge herself when she spotted a news crew filming on the bridge. She approached them and asked them if she could review their video to see if she could spot any sign of Kati’s birth parents.
Xu Holding Up Newspaper Clipping
scmp.com
That was good thinking, as Wu managed to see Qian and Xu standing on the bridge with Xu holding up a poster with his daughter’s name on it. When the news crew understood what was going on, they wanted to share this tragic yet beautiful story of a young Chinese girl separated from her parents at birth.

17. National Television

The news crew was so taken by Qian and Xu’s story that they decided to share it on national television and newspapers. That’s when a friend of the couple from Hangzhou saw one of the reports and put them in touch with the news station where they would meet Annie Wu.
The Pohlers
twitter.com
Qian and Xu frantically went to meet Wu at the station, where she gave them some pictures of their daughter and a letter from the Pohlers, assuring they would be in touch with Qian and Xu again. They were reassured that Jingzhi, now Kati, was fine but that wanted to hear more news about her from the Pohlers.

18. Backing Out

When the Pohlers caught wind of the involvement of the Chinese media, who had broadcast the story across China, they decided to break ties with Annie Wu and Kati’s birth parents. They believed she was still too young for all of this and wanted to protect her. They didn’t want to mix up Kati’s future with her past just yet, and were also satisfied with letting Kati’s birth parents know that she was okay without having to meet.
Ken and Ruth Pohler - Kati's Adopted Parents
cbsnews.com
“We took what we could from Annie, and saw no more need for contact. We thought that we should wait for Kati to grow and see if she wanted more information. She’s our daughter. Yes, she has her birth parents but a deeper relationship with them would really complicate matters,” Ruth told BBC. Wu decided to change her number so that Qian and Xu could no long contact her.

19. The Broken Bridge

Qian and Xu were absolutely devastated when they learned the Pohlers were not interested in meeting at this point, but they continued to visit the Broken Bridge every Qixi Festival for another 10 years. “Since 2004, I have visited the Broken Bridge every year. I knew there wasn’t much hope but I still kept waiting,” Xu told the South China Morning Post.
Xu Holding Up Photo of His Daughter on Broken Bridge
scmp.com
Kati’s birth parents knew they had also written that they should meet on the bridge when their daughter turned 20-years-old, so not all hope was lost. Besides, they would have continued going to the bridge until the end of their days even if she didn’t show up again. Luckily for them, something miraculous would happen just over a decade later.

20. Another Chance

Ten years passed until another opportunity presented itself for Kati’s birth parents. Chang Changfu, a documentary filmmaker was making a short film on Chinese children adopted abroad when a friend told him about Qian and Xu’s tragic story. He thought the story was very moving and decided to find her adopted parents.
Chang Changfu
trend-chaser.com
He was also put in touch with Qian and Xu, and seeing their desire to meet their daughter made him all the more determined to track down the Pohlers. He scoured the internet for any mention of a Chinese girl adopted by an American family from Michigan, but without success.

21. Digging for Clues

Luckily Changfu did some more digging and happened upon an online message board for American parents with adopted children from the Suzhou orphanage. That’s where he saw Ken Pohler’s message, which mentioned how his daughter had a knee problem from rheumatoid arthritis.
The Pohlers
inspiremore.com
Changfu then found a photograph of Ken online that matched the man in the photos given to Qian and Xu. Bingo! He managed to track down the Pohlers, but they were reluctant to participate in case of some ulterior motive. Their final decision was not to stir up Kati’s past, and therefore they decided not to meet Kati’s birth parents on the bridge. Soon, however, the decision wouldn’t be up to the Pohlers.

22. College Years

After Kati graduated from high school, she attended Calvin College where she studied public health and music. When she turned 21-years-old, Kati was about to move to Spain as an exchange student for a semester when she decided to ask her parents about her past.
Kati Pohler
womenofgrace.com
Ken and Ruth Pohler knew that if Kati was interested, they wouldn’t hide the truth from her about her birth parents. She was now old enough to handle the truth as well. Kati decided it was time to ask questions because people in Spain would ask her about being Chinese and American. The question was, how would Kati take the news?

23. A Heart to Heart

While they were in the car one day, Kati asked her mother the million-dollar question, “What do you know about my adoption?” That’s when Ruth said that there was something Kati needed to know; something she should have told her long ago.
Kati Pohler
youtube.com
“Well, we should tell you that we actually know who your biological parents are,” said Ruth. Kati was obviously shocked to learn she was kept in the dark all those years. She was also terrified of the prospect of her birth parents, and it took her some time to come to terms with the information.

24. Planning To Meet

As soon as Kati learned about her birth parents, she wanted to get in touch with Chang Changfu and agreed to be part of his documentary. Changfu planned for Kati to meet Qian and Xu at the Qixi Festival on August 28, 2017 on the broken bridge, but first Changfu would meet her a few days before and take her to the vegetable market where she was abandoned.
Kati Pohler
youtube.com
It would be 22 years since Qian and Xu last saw their baby girl, so Changfu knew everything about this reunion was going to be dramatic and heartwarming. While both sides were looking forward to the reunion, it still came with some fears and reservations.

25. Fears and Trepidation

Kati told the BBC how she was feeling before the reunion. “I think my biggest fear in meeting my biological family is that somehow I’ll disappoint them more. In a lot of ways obviously they feel like they’ve let me down. But I also know how much pain they have gone through.”
Qian and Xu
lifedaily.com
Qian and Xu were feeling the same and had their own set of fears. “What can I say to her when we meet? Would it help to say sorry? No. Ten thousand sorries wouldn’t be enough,” Xu exclaimed to BBC. Qian, on the other hand, said it would be very emotional for her. “I will absolutely and uncontrollably throw myself at her and beg her for forgiveness.” The truth is, nothing could have prepared both sides for what was about to happen.

26. The Emotional Meeting

Changfu prevented Qian and Xu from seeing Kati before the festival, which would have been okay if they weren’t aware of it. However, Annie Wu was back in the picture and informed them that Kati was already in China. They rushed to Suzhou, only to be turned away because Kati was feeling very overwhelmed. They were hurt, but they knew they would meet her on the broken bridge soon enough.
Kati Pohler Meets Her Birth Parents Qian and Xu
lifedaily.com
When Kati finally went to the bridge to meet her birth parents, Qian broke down and sobbed while clinging onto her daughter. “I’ve finally seen you. Mommy is sorry,” Qian cried. She went on to say, “You look so much like your mom, but you don’t know what I’m saying” when she realized Kati couldn’t speak Mandarin.

27. Feeling at Home

After Kati finally met her birth parents after 22 years, she went to stay at their apartment for two days in her sister Xiaochen’s room. It was strange for Kati to comprehend that she had a sister, but they tried to communicate with the little English Xiaochen knew. Qian and Xu also took Kati back to their hometown to see her grandmother who had suffered a severe stroke a few years before. She hadn’t spoke for years, but she held Kati’s hand. After all, her grandmother was there on the houseboat all those years ago where Kati was born.
Kati Pohler with Her Birth Family
youtube.com
Kati was quite surprised at how emotional Qian was, but she understood why. She was also amazed by the Chinese culture, as one of the first things her mother said to her was: “You are skinny. You’ve got to eat more.” She told the BBC that if she didn’t feel like eating, her parents would feed her. “They were just super excited and missed looking after me for all these years.” She also understood how guilt they have must felt, but never blamed them. “They were stuck in a system that was so broken. I think there were just a lot of small moments where I saw how much they really cared.”

28. Culture Clashes

At first, Qian and Xu were a little disappointed that Kati didn’t call them mom and dad. When they asked her to, Kati lied and said that that in America, kids call their parents by their first names. She told them that so as not to hurt their feelings.
Kati Pohler with Her Birth Parents Qian and Xu
youtube.com
“We still feel so much guilt. If we hadn’t abandoned her, she wouldn’t have to suffer so,” Qian told Post Magazine. Qian also couldn’t believe that Kati worked to earn some extra money. She told Kati that Xiaochen never worked. “My Xiaochen here has never had to wash a single bowl,” she exclaimed. Eqaully, when Kati heard how much poverty her parents endured as migrant workers, it seemed like a universe away from how she had grown up.

29. Connecting with Her Roots

Before Kati visited China, her Asian identity was purely based on her physical appearance. She felt like an American through and through. “Now, it’s deeper than that. It’s good that I am more in touch with where I came from, but it is also confusing. I am a product of where I grew up and that is not Asian in any sense of the word,” she told the South China Morning Post.
Kati Pohler with Her Birth Parents Qian and Xu and Sister Xiaochen
asiaone.com
She feels slightly disconnected from her parents because they don’t speak English and she can’t speak a work of Mandarin. Despite the communication difficulties and not knowing what to really call them, Kati does want a relationship with Qian and Xu. Once they got to know what a special lady she grew up to be, they felt proud, but it made it even harder when she had to go back to America. The reunion brought with it a huge relief to know she was okay, but they felt even more desperate to spend time with Kati after so long.

30. Merging Two Worlds

Kati Pohler is still getting used to the idea of having two sets of parents. Qian and Xu have promised to be patient, while Ken and Ruth are happy she found her way back to them. “We love her dearly and she knows that. We haven’t lost anything today,” Ken told the BBC. He added: “We haven’t lost anything at all. We’re just happy for her.” Ruth agreed, emphasizing that she’s just happy Kati reached this point and only wants her to have peace and contentment.
Kati Pohler
scmp.com
Meanwhile, Qian lamented to BBC that “now that we have met her, we miss her even more than before. I guess we can only tell ourselves she is like a daughter who has been married off.” One thing Kati knows for sure is that she’s surrounded by love. “The love is almost overwhelming. I know my adoptive parents love me, and now I have this whole other love that I never knew existed, but I guess was always there.”

If you found this story inspiring, please SHARE with your friends!

Lincoln Said It Best: The Founding Fathers Opposed Slavery



  • June 29, 2011 



  • at 8:48 AM
One gets the sense that some in the media are doing their best to help Michele Bachmann win the Republican nomination by attacking her over ridiculous kerfuffles. The latest example involves her claim that the Founding Fathers "worked tirelessly" to end slavery.  On Good Morning America, host George Stephanopoulos told Bachmann that her claim is " just not true": 
Stephanopoulos: The Pulitzer Prize winning website, Politifact, has found that you have the worst record of making false statements of any of the leading contenders. And I wondered if you wanted to take a chance to clear up some of your past statements. For example earlier this year you said that the Founding Fathers who wrote the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence worked tirelessly to end slavery. Now with respect Congresswoman, that’s just not true. Many of them including Jefferson and Washington were actually slave holders and slavery didn’t end until the Civil War.
Pressed on the issue, Bachmann replied, "Well if you look at one of our Founding Fathers, John Quincy Adams, that’s absolutely true. He was a very young boy when he was with his father serving essentially as his father’s secretary. He tirelessly worked throughout his life to make sure that we did in fact one day eradicate slavery."
Citing only John Quincy Adams may have not made for the strongest argument, as Bachmann herself noted that he was a young boy during the revolution. But in arguing that the Founding Fathers worked to end slavery, Bachmann is on solid ground. She follows in the footsteps of the first Republican president.
The Founders put slavery on the path to ultimate extinction, Abraham Lincoln said. But the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 threatened to bring about slavery's resurgence by opening up new territories to slaveowning. In 1854, Lincoln made this argument in a series of speeches on behalf of candidates opposed to the Kansas-Nebraska Act. "In these addresses Lincoln set forth the themes that he would carry into the presidency six years later," writes Princeton's James M. McPherson in the Battle Cry of Freedom. McPherson summarizes Lincoln's argument:
The founding fathers, said Lincoln, had opposed slavery. They adopted a Declaration of Independence that pronounced all men created equal. They enacted the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 banning slavery from the vast Northwest Territory. To be sure, many of the founders owned slaves. But they asserted their hostility to slavery in principle while tolerating it temporarily (as they hoped) in practice. That was why they did not mention the words "slave" or "slavery" in the Constitution, but referred only to "persons held to service." "Thus, the thing is hid away, in the constitution," said Lincoln, "just as an afflicted man hides away a wen or a cancer, which he dares not cut out at once, lest he bleed to death; with the promise, nevertheless, that the cutting may begin at the end of a given time." The first step was to prevent the spread of this cancer, which the fathers took with the Northwest Ordinance, the prohibition of the African slave trade in 1807, and the Missouri Compromise restriction of 1820. The second was to begin a process of gradual emancipation, which the generation of the fathers had accomplished in the states north of Maryland. 
Here's what Lincoln said of the Founding Fathers in his 1854 Peoria speech:
The argument of "Necessity" was the only argument they ever admitted in favor of slavery; and so far, and so far only as it carried them, did they ever go. They found the institution existing among us, which they could not help; and they cast blame upon the British King for having permitted its introduction. BEFORE the constitution, they prohibited its introduction into the north-western Territory---the only country we owned, then free from it. AT the framing and adoption of the constitution, they forbore to so much as mention the word "slave" or "slavery" in the whole instrument. In the provision for the recovery of fugitives, the slave is spoken of as a "PERSON HELD TO SERVICE OR LABOR." In that prohibiting the abolition of the African slave trade for twenty years, that trade is spoken of as "The migration or importation of such persons as any of the States NOW EXISTING, shall think proper to admit," &c. These are the only provisions alluding to slavery. Thus, the thing is hid away, in the constitution, just as an afflicted man hides away a wen or a cancer, which he dares not cut out at once, lest he bleed to death; with the promise, nevertheless, that the cutting may begin at the end of a given time. Less than this our fathers COULD not do; and NOW [MORE?] they WOULD not do. Necessity drove them so far, and farther, they would not go. But this is not all. The earliest Congress, under the constitution, took the same view of slavery. They hedged and hemmed it in to the narrowest limits of necessity.
In 1794, they prohibited an out-going slave-trade---that is, the taking of slaves FROM the United States to sell.
In 1798, they prohibited the bringing of slaves from Africa, INTO the Mississippi Territory---this territory then comprising what are now the States of Mississippi and Alabama. This was TEN YEARS before they had the authority to do the same thing as to the States existing at the adoption of the constitution. In 1800 they prohibited AMERICAN CITIZENS from trading in slaves between foreign countries---as, for instance, from Africa to Brazil. In 1803 they passed a law in aid of one or two State laws, in restraint of the internal slave trade. In 1807, in apparent hot haste, they passed the law, nearly a year in advance to take effect the first day of 1808---the very first day the constitution would permit---prohibiting the African slave trade by heavy pecuniary and corporal penalties.  In 1820, finding these provisions ineffectual, they declared the trade piracy, and annexed to it, the extreme penalty of death. While all this was passing in the general government, five or six of the original slave States had adopted systems of gradual emancipation; and by which the institution was rapidly becoming extinct within these limits.
Thus we see, the plain unmistakable spirit of that age, towards slavery, was hostility to the PRINCIPLE, and toleration, ONLY BY NECESSITY.
In Lincoln's famous 1860 Cooper Union speech, he noted that of the 39 framers of the Constitution, 22 had voted on the question of banning slavery in the new territories. Twenty of the 22 voted to ban it, while another one of the Constitution's framers--George Washington--signed into law legislation enforcing the Northwest Ordinance that banned slavery in the Northwest Territories. At Cooper Union, Lincoln also quoted Thomas Jefferson, who had argued in favor of Virginia emancipation: "It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation, and deportation, peaceably, and in such slow degrees, as that the evil will wear off insensibly...." 
To be sure, the Founding Fathers weren't abolitionists. But they were overwhelmingly antislavery.
I eagerly await George Stephanopoulos's "fact check" of Honest Abe.

Tuesday, July 2, 2019

This Pride, let’s celebrate shame

Few gay men are proud to have surrendered                             their movement to a hostile takeover                                                 by Democrats, corporations, Marxists,                                         and racial identitarians


June 17, 2019
4:12 PM

New York Police Commissioner James P. O’Neill has formally apologized for the raid of the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in Manhattan, 50 years ago. The proclamation came as the city’s Department of Tourism gears up to host World Pride, making it the official epicenter of Pride Month activities around the globe. Think of it as the Olympics for meth, alcoholism, public fornication, corporate pandering, and hairy asses shoved in the faces of children.
The Stonewall raid of June 28, 1969 sparked riots in New York, and is recognized as the moment the gay rights movement began. Unfortunately, Commissioner O’Neill may have apologized for the wrong reasons. The man in the strippergram uniform should have said:
‘We’re sorry. We were only doing our jobs. We couldn’t have known that a routine check on an illegal business five decades ago would unleash the horror of Pride parades onto the world for the next 50 years.’  
Stonewall is a legend, and the mythology keeps evolving. Back then, all the gay bars in New York were owned by the Mafia. In 1966, ‘Fat Tony’ Lauria of the Genovese crime family purchased Stonewall, then an unassuming family-friendly restaurant, and converted it into a festering dump for gays. The toilets constantly overflowed. There were no fire exits and no soap to wash the glasses. The liquor was watered down and stolen. Employees trafficked prostitutes, and dabbled in blackmailing patrons with threats to ‘out’ them. The cops constantly raided Stonewall and other mob-owned businesses in the area but, because the mob paid off the police, the cops usually gave warnings or came in the middle of the afternoon when no one was there. It’s unknown whether on that fateful night in 1969 the cops were cracking down on the mob, or on corruption in their own ranks, or if the owners of Stonewall simply didn’t get the tip-off in time. What is clear is that Stonewall was not targeted simply because gays hung out there.
Rather than today’s trendy Evil Cop vs. Angelic Minority narrative, historians say the Stonewall riots were as much about gays being fed up living under the heel of the mob as about protesting the laws that criminalized homosexuality. It’s a wonderful thing those laws don’t exist anymore and we owe a lot to the gays of that era. I’ve met some of the men who rioted outside Stonewall. No-nonsense, grisly old fags, they rightfully look with disdain at today’s generation of whiners and crybabies.
But when it comes to historical revisionism, gays are the worst offenders. Most Americans still believe Matthew Shepard, the world’s favorite ‘hate crime’ victim, was killed because he was gay. In fact, it had nothing to do with his sexuality. He was killed during a robbery and drug deal gone terribly wrong, and he was even friends with one of his killers, a gay-for-pay prostitute. Even the bar that President Obama declared a national historic landmark isn’t the location of the original Stonewall, which is an abandoned nail salon next door.
Today, lesbians and Marxists have commandeered the gay rights movement and built up the vast LGBT Industrial Complex. They’re now attempting their most brazen lie yet, that the Stonewall uprising was actually led by ‘trans women of color’. They want everyone to believe gay liberation is owed exclusively to a scrappy band of black drag queens ripping parking meters out of the cement with their teeth to fend off the invaders. This is a lie, but it’s working.
To canonize this falsehood and to posthumously baptize into the cult of transgenderism, which wasn’t even a word in 1969, Marxist powerbrokers have dug up Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, two self-identified transvestites — men who dress in women’s clothing, as opposed to men who think they are women. This year, historical revisionists successfully lobbied the city of New York to install a statue of these two crossdressers outside Stonewall. The problem, historians theorize, is that Rivera was blacked out on heroin 30 blocks north in Bryant Park as the riots unfolded, and Johnson admitted in interviews he wasn’t there when it started. If you believe Johnson chucked the first Molotov cocktail outside Stonewall and started a global revolution, Jussie Smollett is waiting to show you MAGA country.
The gay rights movement was founded by gay men who were almost entirely white. But the taxpayer-funded advertisements for World Pride 2019, plastered on subway cars, streetlights, and billboards in New York City, and in magazines and websites, intentionally feature no images of white people and very few men. It’s mostly obese, sassy black lesbians. And the Pride 50th Anniversary banner a block away from Stonewall features the image of a Muslim woman in a hijab.
This Pride month, let’s acknowledge what gay people can teach us about the virtues of shame. Let their movement be cautionary and instructive. Let us use this month to reflect on how we may be more humble and palatable to our fellow man. Let’s appreciate all the wonderful things that shame has brought to our lives.
Few gay men are proud to have surrendered their movement to a hostile takeover by Democrats, corporations, Marxists, and racial identitarians. There’s also nothing to be proud of when the powerful LGBT lobby thinks so lowly of its own people that all its political gains have been based on lies and misinformation, and all its public figures are scrubbed and sanitized.
The only sense of ‘pride’ I ever felt at being gay came from knowing my forefathers included cultural icons like Oscar Wilde, Quentin Crisp, and Freddie Mercury. Today we’re left with sexless 3D printout Pete Buttigieg, drag-queen story-time in elementary schools, chemically castrated ‘transgender children,’ and an entire generation of privileged little brats addicted to fantasy oppression porn, boycotting chicken sandwiches, and hauling elderly bakers into the Supreme Court. Time to put it away, guys. That’s nothing to be proud of.
As you watch naked, leathery old men with nipple rings waddle down the street, testicles knocking at their knees, or third-rate drag monsters expose their buttholes to crowds of children, just remember that this is not the behavior of an honorable — or even rebellious — people. Everyone knows it, but no one is allowed to say it. It’s hardly even Pride in the Biblical sense. In Christianity, Pride is the first sin, and the most deadly. Pride got Satan expelled from Heaven and Adam and Eve cast out of Paradise. Today’s gay Pride is just corny and mildly uncomfortable.
Of course, the great irony is, come Monday morning after World Pride, millions of gay people will experience some of the deepest, darkest shame of their lives as they wake in a seedy apartment in a mysterious zip code, Cher’s Farewell Tour blaring from the television, a mountain of cocaine on the table, with a sore backside and limbs of indiscriminate origin flung about them. We’ve all been there; it’s part of the Pride experience.
And they should feel ashamed. In psychology, modern affect theory asserts that shame is not learned. It is in our genes, and acts as a kind of emotional circuit-breaker. In his 1872 survey of human emotions, Charles Darwin concluded that shame is universal across human cultures and expressed in exactly the same way by all people. Pop sociologist Brené Brown calls it our most powerful ‘master emotion’, a force that steers us to do good.
As psychologist Joseph Burgo said, American culture over the last 100 years has been at rebellion against shame, particularly related to sex. This revolt has reached fever-pitch in many areas. The more people have given in to abandon, the less happy they have become. They feel they’re entitled to live shame-free lives. But they aren’t. We fail to acknowledge the benefits of healthy, productive shame — constructive criticism, as it is sometimes called — as opposed to the crippling, nuclearized shame of early Puritanical movements and contemporary Islam.
Perhaps if someone told this to Big Gay during those tacky Pride orgies that intend more to shock and offend than to celebrate, then huge swaths of mankind might actually grow to appreciate the gay community, in the way that I once did, rather than merely tolerate it. Maybe, also, many of us would be happier, more stable people.